♥Friday, April 11, 2008
"To similiar to X's report"
At first look, this statement just seem damn ridiculous. Expecially with a second look through the reports, no much/many scientific or logical evidence can justify this.
HOw about this written on your cover sheet of the marked assigment " LATE". I may be voted as one of the bigget procrascinator but definately still on time. Regardless whether Justin Timberlake is proposing to me tomorrow or whether the current government is stepping down, I will definately, still, with my greatest effort "poo poo" something out for " poo poo".
Date of submission: 9th April, and guess wot? I submitted on 9th ARPIL, 2008!
Brillant thats late?
Definition of LATE?
I was puzzled with how to define late, so i went on dictionary .com to LEARN the new vocabulary "LATE"
THis is wot i got from my search : after the usual or proper time, or after delay: to arrive late (late, dictionary .com)
IT wasn't after usual or proper time, just on time, 9th APRIL 2008....
Wake up and knock some sense, I submitted as a whole with my fellow mates. I get the comment "late" they didn't? I recally clearly POO POO giving a lecture on random error, reharsing "shooting aimlessly with a guna at anyone" as random error.
May I return you POO POO, my explanation/ example of random error : Late for me and not for the rest during assignment submission. Or is it just a biased error? Or OBNOXIOUS, OFFENSIVE ERROR, since I wansn't even late! I reckon the last option.
Alright lets stop philosophising the logic sense and see how similiar thigns were. PUtting aside our ego trauma, we went through crtically the reports and even seeked thrid party aids.
Remarks: HUH? don't think its similiar eh, maybe the dotted points are the same?
HOld on, dotted points as in the same kind of dotted points? the usual black mole pattern dotted points?
Hilarious, choose same pattern dots also undesirable. To cut the long story short,
Wot we found similiar was : same cover page (provided for us)
SAME DOTTED PATTERN (usual black mole)
SAME FORMULA
Okay so maybe we should find some solutions for this
Here goes:
to stop having the same formular we need to do the below- 
With that, lets pause and rethink for a second, one person writes the neatly first formula while the other person should write in a rather mathematicaly half assed formula? When both meant the same? Ponder bout this, does the statement still makes any sense? OURAGEOUSLY NO!
oh and you know what, I designed, custom made some dotted points, so that I will not clash with other people in future. 
IN conclusion, its batantly obvious that this is such a significant and mind distrubing issue because we are now talking about maligning the innocence. Although we as a group had discussions , but I will nevertheless strongly contend that we as future scientist did not perform malapropos act to our report to deserve that aghast filled accusing face of yours.
WE will definately not have "COPIED" * hate this word* because we are aware of the future reputation smashed, future ethical problems and lastly we will not put our vulnerable future at rish especially at third year.
I strongly uphold my position that the statement doesn't stand. There is just no good reason to support and the curx of the report isn't it on the content? our contents were discussed together with so many other people but answers were generated with our own thoughts. The only stuff we could find similiar was the presentation like the dot pattern and formula. What comes to mind instantly now is that this staemtns hould be qualified, that is, some logic must be made first particularly before making insupportable accusations.
I blogged@: 9:28 PM